NO ONE HAS A RIGHT TO COME TO AMERICA, IT IS A PRIVILEGE THAT YOU MUST EARN
Supreme Court lifted key components of an injunction against President Trump’s proposed ban on travel from six majority-Muslim nations that pose a threat to America, reinstating most of the policy. Supreme Court will hear full arguments as this fall.
A copy of the Supreme Court of the U.S. (582 U.S.____ (2017) DECISION IS THIS LINK!
The one item that worries me the most is that Donald J. Trump as President of the U.S. is having to fight the “INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, et al.
IMAGINE MY SURPRISE while researching for this article to find out that who else but ex-NAZI GEORGE SOROS, is behind all this.
The suit was filed by lawyers from the International Refugee Assistance Project, the National Immigration Law Center, the Jerome N. Frank Legal Services Organization at Yale Law School, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), and the International Refugee Assistance Project (formerly Iraqi Refugee Assistance Project) at the Urban Justice Center.
ALL FINANCED BY GEORGE SOROS TO KEEP BORDERS OPEN, TO ALLOW UNVETTED IMMIGRATION BY REFUGEES THAT POSE A THREAT TO AMERICA AND OUR WAY OF LIFE. SOROS IS THE AID TO THE SNAKE AGAINST AMERICA!
Listen to what Brietbart had to say about this:
President trump is fighting the UNVETTED illegal immigration overtake of America being financed by a foreign agent that someone made a U.S. Citizen, George Soros. We all know that when a person becomes a citizen, they make a solemn vow to protect the U.S. against foreign and domestic enemies, “So help me GOD.” Well, how is it that WE ALL KNOW SOROS is working against us as an IMMIGRANT and he has broken his vow to protect America, and HE DOES NOT LOOSE his CITIZENSHIP and get DEPORTED? #JeffSessions #ICE
This is a fight that President Donald J. Trump is fighting for us to protect us (all Americans, All Colors, Ethnicities, Religions) from a foreign takeover. We WILL NOT GO THE ROUTE of Europe. This is so huge. This is a fight for the life of the United States and it’s people. Our Constitution is being protected by Our President. He is keeping his promises to protect U.S. Citizens from foreign and domestic enemies. He is working hard to keep us safe.
“Whenever the president finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may, may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary,” Section 212 (f) of the law states, “suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or non-immigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”
The problem I have with this partial ban, is this:
“An American individual or entity that has a bona fide relationship with a particular person seeking to enter the country as a refugee can legitimately claim concrete hardship if that person is excluded,” the court wrote. “As to these individuals and entities, we do not disturb the injunction. But when it comes to refugees who lack any such connection to the United States, for the reasons we have set out, the balance tips in favor of the Government’s compelling need to provide for the Nation’s security.”
My problem is that the ban should have been fully, legally implemented as a whole. Now this partial ban will encourage people to either marry, or claim familiar connections with peoples in the U.S. And the government will have to decide who is legitimate and who is not. This will open us up to law suits, this mess will go on into October of this year. We all know that those seeking this illegal immigration into the U.S. will try to find a way, a connection with someone here to claim Familial connections to get into our country.
“Today’s compromise will burden executive officials with the task of deciding — on peril of contempt — whether individuals from the six affected nations who wish to enter the United States have a sufficient connection to a person or entity in this country,” Thomas wrote. “The compromise also will invite a flood of litigation until this case is finally resolved on the merits, as parties and courts struggle to determine what exactly constitutes a ‘bona fide relationship,’ who precisely has a ‘credible claim’ to that relationship, and whether the claimed relationship was formed ‘simply to avoid §2(c)’ of Executive Order No. 13780.”
What do you think? let me know your thoughts. I welcome them. Thank you for reading my work. God Bless You.
Source: Fox News